1. ADVANCING THE PRACTICE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN THE US – UPDATES. (2017). Forensic Science Review, 29(1), 11-16. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezp-02.lirn.net/docview/1862033018?accountid=158399
2. Baechler, S., & Margot, P. (2016). Understanding crime and fostering security using forensic science: The example of turning false identity documents into forensic intelligence. Security Journal, 29(4), 618-639. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezp-02.lirn.net/10.1057/sj.2015.26
3. Edmond, G., & Vuille, J. (2014). COMPARING THE USE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE IN AUSTRALIA, SWITZERLAND, AND THE UNITED STATES: TRANSCENDING THE ADVERSARIAL-NONADVERSARIAL DICHOTOMY.Jurimetrics, 54(3), 221-276. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezp-02.lirn.net/docview/1541971956?accountid=158399
4. FORENSIC LOCKSMITHING: A KEY TO SOLVING CRIME. (2013). Forensic Examiner, 22(2), 76-77. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezp-02.lirn.net/docview/1439276315?accountid=158399
5. Gabel, J. D. (2014). REALIZING RELIABILITY IN FORENSIC SCIENCE FROM THE GROUND UP. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 104(2), 283-352. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezp-02.lirn.net/docview/1526947497?accountid=158399
6. Kempirova, Z. S. (2016). Negative circumstances in the investigation of crime. their conceptual apparatus, establishment and use in the interests of the investigation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 7(7), 1718-1725. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezp-02.lirn.net/10.14505/jarle.v7.7(21).18
7. Ribaux, O., Crispino, F., Delémont, O., & Roux, C. (2016). The progressive opening of forensic science toward criminological concerns. Security Journal, 29(4), 543-560. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezp-02.lirn.net/10.1057/sj.2015.29

The download will start shortly.